|
View previous topic :: View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
lavardera
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 Posts: 431 Location: merchantville, nj
|
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 5:11 pm Post subject: |
    |
|
did your research include the cost of the print heads and ink tanks? _________________ --
greg |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MikeCharek
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 Posts: 186
|
Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:13 am Post subject: |
    |
|
| lavardera wrote: | | actually, it would be useful to see a cost analysis of the Canon ink tanks + print head cost over a year for a given ml of ink VS the same amount of ink run through an HP using cartridges with integral print heads. |
Actually, the newer Designjets (at least as far back as the 800ps I recently replaced with T610) have separate ink cartridges and printheads.
The T610 uses 6 ink cartridges at $69 each for 130 ml size or $47.25 each for 69 ml size. It also has 3 printheads at $67 each. Not enough track record to see how long all this stuff lasts. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pbacot
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 Posts: 978 Location: Northern California
|
Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:13 am Post subject: |
    |
|
Yes, Fred, see if you can figure out the costs. I found that it's hard to make comparisons with everyone using different terms.
I don't think it's so bad after all with the Canon iPF 610. I got what I wanted, fast, trouble free printing, as long as I plug in the cable.
The ink cartridges cost about twice what they cost for my former HP but they go at least twice as long, and there's two black tanks so you just aren't switching out cartridges so often. Actually the plotter is a bit of extravagance for me. I could get by using the print service, but often I want prints better than they can do or I want one right away. Since the print service now makes better prints from a file than copying from a hard copy (they can really mess that up), the plotter serves more for in-office use, or presentations when I want someone to see just exactly how I meant it to look. And color that so far has been great. _________________ Peter B |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lavardera
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 Posts: 431 Location: merchantville, nj
|
Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:30 am Post subject: |
    |
|
You have to look at the ink on a ml basis, assuming the plotters will use ink at a similar rate (may be erroneous)
The print heads are a bit of a wild card - you have to look at the recommended replacement interval, but performance may be longer or shorter. On the face of it 3x67=201 sounds less than 550, but if they need to be replaced twice as often then it is closer than it appears. _________________ --
greg |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
John Cruet
Joined: 30 Apr 2004 Posts: 362 Location: Guilford, CT
|
Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:40 am Post subject: |
    |
|
In the past year I replaced 10 ink tanks at the cost of $65 each. = $650
20 36 x 150 rolls @ $15 = $300
12- 24" x 150 rolls @ $12 = $144
About $1200, including taxes- for:
1500 2 x 3 sheets
1200 18 x 24 sheets
Farm out to printer would cost me $4,200 per year.
The printer has almost paid for itself right now- a 1 1/2 year payback.
Now you know why all except our biggest orders get printed in house. _________________ John Cruet
G4/733 w/1028 mb RAM & OS 10.4.10, Classic-free, skuzzy-free (runs PC7)
MacBook Pro 2G Intel core duo 2 gig RAM & OS 10.5.4.
PowerCadd 8, WT 9
Canon iP710 printer
www.johncruet.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pbacot
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 Posts: 978 Location: Northern California
|
Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 9:05 am Post subject: |
    |
|
John,
So you even produce full sets for distribution at your office? I hardly ever do that. Hmmm.
This is also reimbursable so... the money stays with you if you charge the same. If you also have the time to do the printing. I do charge for in-house "plots" at a higher rate than the blueprinters, but I keep that down to specific plots, not every one.
One of my main client owns the print shop. Can't go anywhere with that one.
Peter _________________ Peter B |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rob C
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 Posts: 580 Location: Southern Connecticut
|
Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:01 pm Post subject: |
    |
|
I would guess $700 was parts + labor + markup.
Since my 650C/PS died, I haven't had enough volume to justify a replacement plotter. (Every time I go to Service Point, though, I'm sick of the lack of parking. That alone has made me consider Merritt instead.) The HP Z3200 is what I want, but that's because of my photography output. Right now the Epson SP2200 is still hanging in there although it's limit is 13"x19". For everything larger, I cut out color and stick to B&W print service. _________________ Rob
www.robertcoolidge.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
John Cruet
Joined: 30 Apr 2004 Posts: 362 Location: Guilford, CT
|
Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:12 pm Post subject: |
    |
|
| pbacot wrote: | John,
So you even produce full sets for distribution at your office? I hardly ever do that. Hmmm.
This is also reimbursable so... the money stays with you if you charge the same. If you also have the time to do the printing. I do charge for in-house "plots" at a higher rate than the blueprinters, but I keep that down to specific plots, not every one.
One of my main client owns the print shop. Can't go anywhere with that one.
Peter |
Peter:
With my system I only have to occasionally visit my Canon machine to straighten out the volume of prints that come out. It simply isn't worth it for me to send out to a printer for orders smaller than 40 prints at a time. I can be working while my printer is printing since it auto-cuts each sheet from the roll feed.
There is little reason for me to charge more money for house plots than for plots that my print service does. i charge the same rate for either.
Of course my preferred way of project delivery is to send full size PDFs to my clients via either email or FTP.  _________________ John Cruet
G4/733 w/1028 mb RAM & OS 10.4.10, Classic-free, skuzzy-free (runs PC7)
MacBook Pro 2G Intel core duo 2 gig RAM & OS 10.5.4.
PowerCadd 8, WT 9
Canon iP710 printer
www.johncruet.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|